Equality vs. Equity


Is it fair to say that we should all be treated equally? While a single person who treats others with equal kindness or compassion has an honorable and fair connotation, "equality" takes an entirely different meaning when implemented into institutional practice. Equality is sameness in treatment, and equality in practice will never uplift PoC to the same standing as white folk.

We see PoC lacking in comparison to their white counterparts, but why? Consider how imperialist, colonial forces molded the education system. Schooling for children of color was used for assimilation into white culture, and these oppressors did so through the construction of knowledge; by rewriting or leaving out PoC history and perspectives altogether from official historic and academic texts, they labeled​ Western and white-centric narratives as “the truth” in all levels of education while dehumanizing other ethnic cultures as uncivilized, depraved and barbaric. (Video on the left: The Unequal Opportunity Race, a short film showing metaphors for obstacles to equality which affirmative action tries to alleviate)

​The Colonial Mindset and white supremacist ideology created the unfair structures we see today. It's injected not only into the individual's way of thinking, but governmental and authoritative institutions and how they operate and serve PoC and whites alike. Yet, while we've eliminated overtly racist structures (slavery and colonialism), stopping them doesn't magically solve the problem. We now must deal with its aftermath: the trauma and disparity within PoC communities, and the pervasiveness of racism and colorism within society's collective beliefs.

Being subjugated for such a long period of time meant that upon 'freedom' they still were leagues behind their former oppressors in terms of capital/generational wealth. White people have only ​benefitted from the old systems of power — even if their forefathers weren't plantation owners or the like, just being white automatically gave a person more advantages than being person of color. And 'freedom' only ushered in a new forms of oppression: upon slavery’s end came the era of Jim Crow and segregation; the many xenophobic immigration bans of Asian and other ethnic groups, followed by the erasure of non-white ethnic cultures and viewpoints from major, academic history texts and lack of responsibility by their former oppressors. This trickles into disproportionate numbers of PoC living in poverty and without access to higher education, frequently incarcerated or victimized by police brutality; public school funding based on property tax and standardized testing; the school-to-prison pipeline. Threats to low-income, majority non-white housing and recent and ongoing threats to Ethnic Studies imply little value to people of color. The list goes on and on...

❝ Everyone works hard and struggles. ​But there's this feeling
that it's going to be harder for us. ❞ - Lawrence Leonn, 16

(LA Times "For Asian Americans, A changing landscape on college admissions")


​​One might say we live in a Post-racial era, but is this truly the case? Old systematic rules and ideas have morphed into the hurdles and threats of today. ​Therefore, those who gain from such systems mustn't assume that others of different ethnicities can simply work hard ("pull themselves up by their own bootstraps") to get on the same level as they are; because we do not all begin at the same starting line and some people face more obstacles than others.

​​​Once we understand how and why communities of color are systemically disadvantaged in our society, we see that treating everyone equally will not alleviate the issue. The aftereffects of racist and white supremacist structures still permeate and exist today, and in order for real change to happen we must tackle it directly with full acknowledgement and direct action.

​Through  mass mobilization (creation of PoC organizations, uniting all oppressed communities for the singular cause, conducting protests and strikes against discriminatory and unfair practices) and fair, affirmative action (the policy of favoring disadvantaged groups who suffer or have suffered from discrimination within a culture) can we bridge the divide and reach not equality, but equity for all.

Concluding thoughts: It's eye-opening to talk about racial disparity in a straightforward and blunt manner, because it enables us to unlearn and reject negative, racist stereotypes that we've internalized and begin thinking critically of the world we live in. I think a lot of people misconstrue racism because they think individuals are solely to blame when they face hard times, but more often than not they are just victims of circumstances out of their control. And although people personally find it uncomfortable talking about the privileges we have, I think we must utilize the discomfort we feel to make a more fair and equitable world.

This post was an assignment from my Fall 2017 course, Sociology 142, Filipina/o American Community Issues by Professor Roderick Daus-Magbual, Ed.D. View the original post and the rest of my group's (A Brother & Three Sisters) posts here.

The People's Struggle for National Democracy

(Source: Manila Today, 23 January 2017)

Kapataang Matabayan

(Source: kabataangmakabayan.wordpress.com)

The Kapataang Matabayan (KM) was founded in 1964 by Filipino revolutionary Jose Maria Sison. It is a radical and political group comprised of mostly students and youth, affiliated with the National Democratic Movement of the Philippines. On a short essay commemorating the 50th founding anniversary of the organization, Sison writes, "We wanted to base the KM on the revolutionary tradition of the Filipino people" (National Democratic Front of the Philippines). Inspired by figures of Philippine history who fought against Spanish imperialism, KM sparked revolutionary political awakenings within youth and "appealed to many who sincerely hoped for change but were disappointed by the dull choices offered by mainstream politics" (Manila Today). With the majority of members ranging between the ages of 16 to 22, the population of youth and students led massive actions that directly influenced the Philippine Revolution; however, the group was forced to work underground under Marcos' fascist dictatorship around 1968.

(Source: LFS-UP Dillman FB Page)

League of Filipino Students


The League of Filipino Students (LFS) was founded September 11th, 1977. It had its beginnings in the Marcos era, initially fighting against tuition hikes and student repression under martial law and the Marcos dictatorship. "It gathered the militant students and student organizations committed to the protection of the student’s democratic rights. The LFS played a crucial role in dismantling military presence in the campuses and in the restoration of student publications and student councils" (LFS-SFSU Website).
(Source: LFS-SFSU FB Page)
One of the largest mass student organizations, the League of Filipino Students have chapters in universities, secondary schools, technical & vocational institutions all across the Philippines. They also have opened their first international chapter in the United States, at California's San Francisco State University (LFS-UP Dillman FB Page). 

​With the fight for education still within the hearts of LFS, in 1982 the Leaque of Filipino Students also fully embraced the National Democratic movement and program.




The National Democratic Movement

(Source: Wikipedia)
Inspired by socialist, Marxist-Leninist-Maoist principles, the National Democratic Movement is a transnational alliance of progressive political groups advocating for social, economical, and political justice against three fundamental problems behind the oppressive conditions of Philippine society: Imperialism, Feudalism and Bureaucrat Capitalism. The main objective is to unite and liberate the Filipino masses: the disenfranchised poor and working class, indigenous peoples, youth, students, and other oppressed populations. Through organization and direct action against government corruption, landlordism, monopoly capitalists, and foreign imperialism, they strive to achieve the genuine national liberation of the Philippines, and preserve and  the national democratic rights of the people.


❝ A nation that does not renew itself

through progressive minded and

militant youth cannot possibly advance.

A world of timid and apathetic youth merely feed

all the regimes of injustice and exploitation. 


Only through militant struggle

can the best in youth emerge. ❞ 

- Jose Maria Sison


Concluding thoughts: The political atmosphere is arguably more tense within the Philippines than within the US—you can also argue that the atmospheres are incredibly similar, especially in this year 2017. While the "red scare" and skewed misrepresentations of communism throughout history cast Marxism and socialism in a bad light, we must take a closer look at their underlying ideas that truly value the livelihood and welfare of the people in comparison to how capitalism, imperialism and colonialism has been known to value us so far; and why is it more common for youth of today to be more left-leaning than our previous generations.

This post was an assignment from my Fall 2017 course, Sociology 142, Filipina/o American Community Issues by Professor Roderick Daus-Magbual, Ed.D. View the original post and the rest of my group's (A Brother & Three Sisters) posts here.